(HC) Johnson v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BILLY RAY JOHNSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-01313-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETITION 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT STUART SHERMAN, TO MAIL PETITIONER BLANK § 2254 HABEAS FORMS 15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner Billy Ray Johnson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

19 I.

20 DISCUSSION 21 The Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“Habeas Rules”) require preliminary review of a habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254; see also McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994).

27 Habeas Rule 2(c)(5) states that the habeas petition must “be signed under penalty of perjury by the petitioner.” Here, Petitioner did not sign the petition under penalty of perjury.

1 | (ECF No. 1). Accordingly, the Court will grant Petitioner the opportunity to file an amended | petition, and Petitioner must sign the amended petition under penalty of perjury.

3 I.

4 ORDER 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. Petitioner is GRANTED THIRTY (30) days from the date of service of this order in 7 which to file an amended petition that is signed under penalty of perjury; and 8 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner blank § 2254 habeas forms.

9 Petitioner is forewarned that failure to follow this order may result in a recommendation | for dismissal of the petition pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (a petitioner’s | failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order may result in a dismissal of the action).

B IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ September 7, 2021 [sf ey 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE