Na Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema, Ltd.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Na Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema, Ltd.
Trial Court Opinion
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 SUZANNE NA PIER, an individual, Case No. 1:21-cv-00888-AWI-JLT
12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSAL WITH 13 v. PREJUDICE (Doc. 9) 14 RIDGECREST CINEMA, LTD
15 Defendants.
16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 9) The 18 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with 19 further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose,
111 F.3d 688, 692(9th Cir. 1997). 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: September 9, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 23 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown