Corral v. California Highway Patrol

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN CORRAL, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00822-DAD-JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE 13 v. ) TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS ) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., ) [21-DAY DEADLINE] 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 On August 9, 2021, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the complaint and directed the plaintiff to file a first amended complaint within 30 days and pay the required filing fee at the time of filing. (Doc. 4.) More than 30 days have passed, and the plaintiff has not filed a first amended complaint.

21 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in exercising that power, may impose sanctions, including dismissal of an action. Thompson v. Housing Auth., City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 26 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986). A court may dismiss an action based on a party’s failure to prosecute an action, obey a court order, or comply with local rules. See, e.g., Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with a court order to amend a complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130-31 (9th Cir. 1987) (dismissal for failure to comply with a court order); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (dismissal for failure to prosecute and to comply with local rules).

4 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the plaintiff to show cause in writing, within 21 days of the date of service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Alternatively, within that same time, the plaintiff may file a first amended complaint and pay the required filing fee at the time of filing the first amended complaint.

8 The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the Court dismiss the action.

11 IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 Dated: September 20, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 13 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE