Barker v. Stoli Group (USA), LLC

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Jonathan Barker, No. 2:20-cv-02170-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv.

Stoli Group (USA), LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 The motion for leave to file redacted documents, ECF No. 21, is denied without | prejudice to renewal. Any renewed motion must be supported by information that would permit | this court to find “a compelling reason” to withhold information from the public and to | “articulate[] the factual basis for [that] ruling, without relying on hypothesis or conjecture.” Ctr.

21 | for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096-97 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting | Kamakana vy. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006)).

23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 DATED: September 22, 2021.