(PC) Loveless v. Parole Authorities of the California Board of Parole Hearings
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL J. LOVELESS, No. 2:21-CV-0430-WBS-DMC-P
Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PAROLE AUTHORITIES OF THE
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE
HEARINGS,
Defendant.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 4, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. More than 30 days has elapsed and Plaintiff has not complied.
Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See id.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991),
Dated: September 29, 2021 Ssvcqo_
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.