(PS) Sprague v. Hull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEROME H. SPRAGUE, et al., No. 2:20-cv-2273-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER

JUSTICE HARRY E. HULL, PRESIDING

JUSTICE VANCE W. RAYE,

Defendants.

On August 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 16, 2021, are ADOPTED; 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 5, is granted; 3. Plaintiffs’ complaint, ECF No. 1, is dismissed with prejudice; and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

DATED: September 30, 2021. l ti / ¢ q_/ ‘ CHIEF NT] ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE