(PC) Williams v. Unknown
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MELVIN WILLIAMS, No. 2: 20-cv-1950 KJM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER UNKNOWN, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff is granted thirty days to file a fourth amended complaint.
20 On March 25, 2021, the undersigned issued an order and findings and recommendations addressing plaintiff’s motion to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 38.) The undersigned recommended that claim two, alleging denial of access to the courts, and claim three be dismissed as improperly joined. (Id.) The undesigned also recommended that plaintiff’s request for release from custody, contained in claim one, be dismissed as improperly raised in a civil rights action. (Id.) The undersigned dismissed claim one and the part of claim two alleging mishandling of plaintiff’s petition for medical parole with leave to file a third amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) //// 1 On April 8, 2021 plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. (ECF No. 39.)
2 On September 28, 2021, the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller adopted the March 25, 2021 | findings and recommendations, except for the recommendation that plaintiff's request for release | from custody be dismissed as improperly raised in a civil rights action. (ECF No. 61.) Judge || Mueller dismissed with leave to amend plaintiff's request for release from custody, contained in || claim one, based on allegedly unsafe conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic. (Id.) 7 Based on Judge Mueller’s order granting plaintiff leave to amend as to his request for | release from custody, plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a fourth || amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file a fourth amended complaint within that time, the || undersigned will issue further orders addressing the third amended complaint filed April 8, 2021.
11 If plaintiff files a fourth amended complaint, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot | refer to a prior pleading in order to make plaintiff's amended complaint complete. Local Rule || 220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior | pleading. This requirement exists because, as a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes || the original complaint. See Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. | 2015) (‘an ‘amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non- || existent.’” (internal citation omitted)). Therefore, a fourth amended complaint must contain each | claim and allege the involvement of each named defendant.
19 Plaintiff shall not include any of the claims dismissed by Judge Mueller in a fourth || amended complaint.
21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date || of this order to file a fourth amended complaint; if plaintiff does not file a fourth amended || complaint within that time, the undersigned will issue further orders addressing the third amended | complaint filed April 8, 2021.
25 || Dated: October 1, 2021 %6 Foci) Aharon 27 KENDALL J. NE Will1950.0rd(2) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.