(PC) Miller v. McTaggart

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:21-cv-1521 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND K. MCTAGGART, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 On September 3, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty-days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this game; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the | objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4 | Dated: October 13, 2021 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY?

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9} 1 10 mill1521.fta 1]