Crawford v. City of Bakersfield
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LESLIE LARAY CRAWFORD, Case No. 1:14-cv-01735-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE V. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Defendants. (ECF No. 145)
On October 25, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 145.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees.
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Af | Dated: _ October 26, 2021 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.