Hernandez v. Industrial Finishes and Systems, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Hernandez v. Industrial Finishes and Systems, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 Dennis D. Strazulo (SBN 124695) Carla Vasques Dos Santos-Moore (SBN 241883) 2 O’HAGAN MEYER 221 Caledonia Street 3 Sausalito, California 94965 Telephone: 415.578.6900 4 Facsimile: 415.578.6910 Email: [email protected] 5 [email protected]

6 Attorneys for Defendant INDUSTRIAL FINISHES AND SYSTEMS, INC. 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JOHNNY HERNANDEZ, an individual, Case No. 1:21-CV-00460-AWI-JLT

12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION

13 v. (Doc. 21)

14 INDUSTRIAL FINISHES AND SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation, and DOES 1-10, 15 inclusive,

16 Defendants. 17 18

19 INDUSTRIAL FINISHES AND SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation, 20 Counter-Claimant, 21 v. 22 JOHNNY HERNANDEZ, an individual, and 23 DOES 11-30, inclusive,

24 Counter-Defendants.

25 26 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs JOHNNY HERNANDEZ and 27 INDUSTRIAL FINISHES AND SYSTEMS, INC., by and through their respective counsel of record, 28 that this action be dismissed in its entirety, including the Complaint and Counter-Claim and any and 1 all claims for relief in the above-referenced matter, WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rules of 2 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 3 IT IS HEREBY SO AGREED. 4 5 DATED: 10/27/2021 Respectfully submitted,

6 THE AZAT LAW GROUP 7 /s/ Issa Y. Azat, Jr. 8 MICHAEL O. AZAT ISSA Y. AZAT, JR. 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant JOHNNY HERNANDEZ 10

11 DATED: 10/27/2021 Respectfully submitted, 12 O’HAGAN MEYER 13

14 /s/ Carla Vasques dos Santos-Moore DENNIS D. STRAZULO 15 CARLA VASQUES DOS SANTOS-MOORE Attorneys for Defendant 16 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS AND FINISHES, INC.

17

18 19 DATED: 10/27/2021 Respectfully submitted,

20 SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C.

21 /s/ Jonathan W. Black S. BRETT SUTTON 22 JARED HAGUE 23 JONATHAN W. BLACK Attorneys for Counter-Claimant 24 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS AND FINISHES, INC. 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER 2 The parties have stipulated to the entire action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 21) 3 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with 4 further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997). 5 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

8 Dated: October 28, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9

10

11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown