P&B Intermodal v. Johnson
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
P&B INTERMODAL, No. 2:21-cv-0603-KJM-CKD PS
Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 14, 17)
MARCEY JOHNSON,
Defendant.
On August 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// ///// ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiffs motion for default judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED under the terms specified herein;
3. Judgment is entered in plaintiffs favor and against defendant; 4. Plaintiff is awarded a constructive trust upon the settlement proceeds in defendant’s actual or constructive possession in the amount of $32,399.19, plus interest accrued; and 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
DATED: November 10, 2021. ee
CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.