(HC) Jeffries v. Clark
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1] ANDREW JEFFRIES, No. 2:20-cv-2414 JAM KJN P Petitioner,
Vv. ORDER
KEN CLARK,
Respondent.
Petitioner requested the appointment of counsel. As petitioner acknowledges, there currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 28) is denied without prejudice.
Dated: November 18, 2021
Aectl Aharon a7 KENDALL J.NE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE jjermaia.si0
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.