Solorio v. Fig Garden Home Owners Association
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT SOLORIO, et al., Case No. 1: 21-cv-01662-NONE-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE BNSF RAILWAY
v. COMPANY AND NATIONAL RAILROAD
PASSENGER CORPORATION AS
FIG GARDEN HOME OWNERS DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION ASSOCIATION, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 5, 6) Defendants.
On November 30, 2021, Plaintiffs filed notices of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) of Defendants BNSF Railway Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.) The dismissal of Defendant BNSF Railway Company is without prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 5.) The dismissal of Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation is with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 6.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active.
Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 26
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants BNSF Railway Company, and National Railroad Passenger Corporation as defendants in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. OF a Se Dated: _December 1, 2021 _ ef
0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.