United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Negrete v. Dong

(PC) Negrete v. Dong
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided December 3, 2021
(PC) Negrete v. Dong

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSE NEGRETE, No. 2:21-cv-0429 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND JULIE DONG, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 On October 19, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within 30 days and was warned that failure to do so would result in recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 | (9th Cir. 1991).

3 || Dated: December 3, 2021 Card Kt | ([z4 □□□ 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE fi negr0429.fta 1]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.