(PC) Hosley v. Hill

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DASHEME KAREME HOSLEY No. 2:21-cv-00362-JAM-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. HILL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed June 29, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. ECF No. 7. The court granted plaintiff an additional 30 day period of time to file an amended complaint by order dated September 22, 2021. ECF No. 13. That thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

22 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1] || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 | (9th Cir. 1991).

3 || Dated: December 6, 2021 Card Kt | La Ly (g— 4 CAROLYN K.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 12/hosl0362.fta.2nd.docx