United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(PC) Bradford v. Mebane

(PC) Bradford v. Mebane
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided December 7, 2021
(PC) Bradford v. Mebane

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-1410 JAM CKD P

Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DARNELL MEBANE, et al.,

Defendants.

On November 5, 2021, the court ordered that plaintiff pay the $402 filing fee for this action. Plaintiff was warned that failure to pay the filing fee would result in dismissal. The deadline for payment of the filing fee has passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// /////

1] || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: December 7, 2021 Card Kt | ([z4 □□□ CAROLYNK.DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE fi brad1410.fpf

1]

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.