United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2021

(SS) Fillmore v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Fillmore v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided December 21, 2021
(SS) Fillmore v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

Cyrus Safa

Attorney at Law: 282971

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing

12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670

Tel.: (562) 868-5886

Fax: (562) 868-8868

E-mail: [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Haley J. Fillmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALEY J. FILLMORE, ) Case No.: 2:20-cv-01599-DMC )

Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF vs. ) ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO ) THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND NO Acting Commissioner of Social ) COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § Security, ) 1920 )

Defendant. ) )

TO THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. COTA, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Haley J. Fillmore be awarded attorney fees in the amount of three thousand seven-hundred seventy- eight dollars and seventy five cents ($3,778.75) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of

Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 2 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Haley J. Fillmore, the government will consider the matter of Haley J. Fillmore's assignment of EAJA fees to Cyrus Safa. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Haley J. Fillmore, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Haley J. Fillmore does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Haley J. Fillmore.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Cyrus Safa.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Haley J. Fillmore's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Haley J. Fillmore and/or Cyrus Safa including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury This award is without prejudice to the rights of Cyrus Safa and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. DATE: December 8, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Cyrus Safa

BY: __________________ Cyrus Safa

Attorney for plaintiff HALEY J. FILLMORE

DATED:December 8, 2021 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

Acting United States Attorney PETER K. THOMPSON

Regional Chief Counsel

Social Security Administration

/s/ Daniel P. Talbert

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization)

ORDER

Approved and so ordered:

Dated: December 21, 2021 Svc.

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.