(SS) Marin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.
CA Bar ID No.: 278044 Peña & Bromberg, PLC 2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320 Fresno, CA 93721 Telephone: 559-439-9700 Facsimile: 559-439-9723 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff, Raymond Anthony Marin
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION Raymond Anthony Marin, Case No. 1:20-cv-01419-NONE-BAM
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD
AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY
v. FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT
TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting JUSTICE ACT; ORDER Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT-HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS and 95/100 ($5,870.95) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. §1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 21, 2021 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña
J ONATHAN O. PEÑA Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: December 21, 2021 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
PETER K. THOMPSON Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By: _*_Chantal Jenkins Chantal Jenkins Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant (*Permission to use electronic signature obtained via email on December 21, 2021). ORDER
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (the “Stipulation”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) filed on December 22, 2021 (Doc. No. 26.):
IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT-HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS and 95/100 ($5,870.95) as authorized by the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 9 U.S.C. §1920
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 27, 2021 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.