1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAHEEM KARRIEM, Case No. CV 20-05922-MWF (PD)

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING, FINDINGS, 13 v. CONCLUSIONS, AND 14 RECOMMENDATIONS OF JANINE WALLACE, UNITED STATES 15 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND 16 DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY 17

18

19 Pursuant to

, the Court has reviewed the First Amended 20 Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United 21 States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation 22 have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and adopts 23 it as its own findings and conclusions. 24 Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial 25 showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its 26 procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability will not issue in 27 this action. See

(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. 28 1 || Cockrell,

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel,

, 484 2 || (2000). Accordingly, the First Amended Petition is denied without prejudice. 3 4 DATED: January 28, 2021. 5 / <p 6 th he Be T JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28