United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2021

Orlando Garcia v. Apple Seven Services SPE San Diego, Inc.

Orlando Garcia v. Apple Seven Services SPE San Diego, Inc.
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided March 11, 2021
Orlando Garcia v. Apple Seven Services SPE San Diego, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

O

United States District Court

Central District of California

ORLANDO GARCIA, Case № 2:21-cv-00841-ODW (PVCx) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v.

DISMISS AS MOOT [7]

APPLE SEVEN SERVICES SPE SAN

DIEGO, INC.,

Defendants.

Defendant Apple Seven Services SPE San Diego, Inc. served Plaintiff Orlando Garcia with a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss in this case on February 21, 2021. (ECF No. 7.) On March 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, less than twenty-one days after Defendant filed its responsive pleading. (ECF No. 9.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) allows Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint once as a matter of course within twenty-one days of service with a Rule 12(b) motion. Therefore, Plaintiff's amended complaint was proper. As the pending motion to dismiss was based on a complaint that is no longer operative, the motion is DENIED as MOOT. See Ramirez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 11, 2021 ss . wg

Gd lliid

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.