United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2021

Jinxing Investment LLC v. Mena Manuel A, Jr.

Jinxing Investment LLC v. Mena Manuel A, Jr.
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided March 25, 2021
Jinxing Investment LLC v. Mena Manuel A, Jr.

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JINXING INVESTMENT LLC, Case No. CV 21-2510 JFW (PVCx) Plaintiff,

ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING v. IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION MENA MANUEL A., JR.,

Defendant.

The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state court summarily because Defendant removed it improperly.

On March 23, 2021, Defendant, having been sued in what appears to be a routine unlawful detainer action in California state court, filed a Notice of Removal of that action to this Court and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has denied Defendant’s IFP application under separate cover because the action was not properly removed. To prevent the action from remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the Court issues this Order to remand the action to state court.

Simply stated, this action could not have been originally filed in federal court because the complaint does not competently allege facts supporting either diversity or federal-question jurisdiction, and therefore removal is improper. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); see Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Sves., Inc., 545 U.S. 546, 563 (2005).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that (1) this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, West Covina Courthouse, 1427 West Covina Parkway, West Covina, CA 91790 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); (2) the Clerk send a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED. ll

DATED: March 25, 2021 hed, yn LEE BD D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ae

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.