Gennaro Bruno v. Warden
Gennaro Bruno v. Warden
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GENNARO BRUNO, Case No. CV 20-6390 JFW (PVC)
12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, 13 v. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED 14 WARDEN, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records 18 and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 19 Judge and Petitioner’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the 20 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court 21 concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 22 23 In the Objections, Petitioner requests that his habeas petition be re-filed as a civil 24 rights complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 25
403 U.S. 388(1971). However, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report 26 and Recommendation, it is not appropriate to do so here because Petitioner has not 27 satisfied the pre-filing requirements for civil rights actions, and the Petition itself is not on 28 its face readily construable as a civil rights complaint. Petitioner does not appear to have 1 || exhausted his administrative remedies, and did not pay the $350 filing fee applying to 2 || prisoner civil rights actions or request to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee. 3 || Moreover, the Warden of FCI Victorville is the sole named Respondent, but the Petition 4 || does not contain any allegations explaining what the Warden did or did not do, or why the 5 || Warden’s actions or inaction violated Petitioner’s constitutional rights. However, because 6 || dismissal of this action is without prejudice, Petitioner may refile his claims as a civil 7 || rights action following exhaustion of his claims, in a civil rights complaint naming as 8 || defendant(s) the individual(s) who directly violated his constitutional rights, and 9 || supported by a request to proceed in forma pauperis or payment of the full filing fee for 10 || civil actions. 11 12 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without 13 |] prejudice. 14 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the 16 || Judgment herein on Petitioner at his address of record and on counsel for Respondent. 17 18 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 19 20 || DATED: June 7, 2021 21 .
22 ; 23 a Be ED STATES | DISTRICT JUDGE 24 ea
25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown