1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURJAN GERMAINE GRAY, Case No. CV 20-490-JAK (PD)

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT 13 v. AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, 14 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF 15 Respondent. UNITED STATE 16 MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF 17 APPEALABILITY

18

19 Pursuant to

, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records 20 on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 21 (“Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, and Respondent’s Reply to the 22 Objections. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the 23 Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it 24 as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. 25 Further, for the reasons stated in the Report, the Court finds that Petitioner 26 has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and 27 28 1 || therefore a certificate of appealability is denied. See

(c)(2); Fed. R. 2 || App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell,

(2008). 3 41 DATED: June 11, 2021 5 C) Ww. hp 6 JOHN A. KRONSTADT 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28