1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CYMEYOLV V. HILL, ) NO. CV 21-5858-JLS(E) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ) 14 NATURAL VISION MEDICAL GROUP, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ______________________________) 16 17 18 Plaintiff, allegedly a civil detainee confined at the Salinas 19 Valley Prison in Monterey County, California, filed this civil rights 20 action pursuant to

on July 19, 2021. Defendant 21 is alleged to reside in the City of Ledera, within the Northern 22 District of California. Plaintiff alleges events or omissions 23 assertedly occurring within the Northern District of California. 24 25 Section 1391(b) of Title 28, United States Code, provides: 26 27 A civil action may be brought in -- 28 /// 1 (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if 2 all defendants are residents of the State in which the 3 district is located; 4 5 (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the 6 events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a 7 substantial part of property that is the subject of the 8 action is situated; or 9 10 (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise 11 be brought as provided in this section, any judicial 12 district in which any defendant is subject to the court's 13 personal jurisdiction with respect to such action. 14 15 Here, it appears that Defendant resides in the Northern District 16 of California, and that the events or omissions giving rise to 17 Plaintiff’s purported claims allegedly occurred within the Northern 18 District of California. 19 20 Section 1406(a) of Title 28, United States Code, provides: 21 22 The district court of a district in which is filed a 23 case laying venue in the wrong division or district 24 shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, 25 transfer such case to any district or division in which 26 it could have been brought. 27 /// 28 /// 1 This Court has the power to decide the venue issue on its own 2 motion and to dismiss or transfer the action before a responsive 3 pleading is filed. See Costlow v. Weeks,

(9th 4 Cir. 1986). 5 6 Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the parties 7 shall show cause in writing, if there be any, why this action should 8 not be transferred to the United States District Court for the 9 Northern District of California on the ground that venue is improper 10 in the Central District of California. Failure timely to respond to 11 this Order to Show Cause may result in the transfer of the action. 12 13 DATED: July 23, 2021. 14 15 /S/ CHARLES F. EICK 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28