United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2021

Anselmo E. Perez v. Craig Koenig

Anselmo E. Perez v. Craig Koenig
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided September 21, 2021
Anselmo E. Perez v. Craig Koenig

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 21-3912 CAS (MRW) Date September 21, 2021 Title Perez v. Koenig Present: Hon. Michael R. Wilner, U.S. Magistrate Judge Veronica Piper n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys for Petitioner: Attorneys for Respondent: n/a n/a Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOTION RESPONSE 1. In August 2021, the Attorney General moved to dismiss this habeas corpus action. (Docket # 10.) By separate order, the Court informed Petitioner of his obligation (under Local Rule 7-12 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41) to respond to the motion.

Petitioner’s response was due by September 10, 2021. (Docket # 12.) To date, however, Petitioner has not filed any response to the motion.

Petitioner is ordered to show cause why this action should not summarily be dismissed due to his failure. Petitioner may respond to this order to show cause by filing his opposition to the original motion plus an explanation for his late filing by October 12.

The Court will not entertain any request for a continuance but for good cause supported by competent evidence.

Failure to comply with the terms of this order may result ina recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Proc. 41(b). Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Lichtenegger, 913 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2019).

CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.