Sanai v. Kozinski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYRUS SANAI, Case No. 4:19-cv-08162-YGR Plaintiff, ORDER: (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO HOLD Vv. HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS; AND (2) DEFERRING PLAINTIFF’S ALEX KOZINSKI, ET AL., ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ORDER SERVICE BY U.S. MARSHALS Defendants.

Re: Dkt. Nos. 36, 55, 56, 64, 66 Following the completion of briefing on the pending motions, the Court has reviewed pro se plaintiff Cyrus Sanai’s administrative motion requesting a hearing on the pending motion to dismiss, and motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. (See Dkt. Nos. 36 (motion to 14 dismiss), 55 (motion for leave to file first amended complaint), 56 (administrative motion).) The administrative motion is DENIED. The Court intends to rule on the motions without oral argument, || as permitted by Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. See also Lake at 17 Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Dev. Corp., 933 F.2d 724, 728-29 (9th Cir. O

18 || 1991).

The Court further DEFERS Sanai’s administrative motion to order service by the United States Marshals until the Court rules on the pending motions.

This Order terminates Docket Number 56.

IT Is SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2021

Loypont Hptfflees, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE