United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2021

Vangala v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Vangala v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided January 14, 2021
Vangala v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Trial Court Opinion

DAVID L. ANDERSON (CABN 149604)

United States Attorney

SARA WINSLOW(DCBN 457643)

Chief, Civil Division

ELIZABETH KURLAN (CABN 255869)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: 415-436-7298 [email protected]

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

AKHILESH VANGALA, et al., ) No. 4:20-cv-8143-HSG )

Plaintiffs, ) ) STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; v. ) ORDER )

UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND )

IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., ) Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. )

Defendants. ) )

The parties, through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court to stay proceedings in this case for a limited time, until February 15, 2021. The parties make this joint request because they are engaged in settlement discussions and an administrative resolution that may render further litigation of this case unnecessary.

Plaintiffs filed this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, challenging United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) implementation of a “blank space” rejection criteria for certain immigration benefits forms. On December 3, 2020, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. ECF No. 21. Shortly after this action was filed, however, the parties entered into settlement discussions. In light of the parties’ pursuit of a potential settlement in lieu of litigation, the parties conferred and agree that judicial economy would best discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request that the proceedings in this case be stayed until February15, 2021, at which time the parties will file a joint status report with the Court. At that time, the parties may request a further continuance of the stay of proceedings, court approval of a proposed settlement agreement and dismissal of the litigation if appropriate, or placement of the case back on the Court’s active docket. A stay of proceedings in this case will benefit the parties and conserve the Court’s resources while the parties pursue a potential settlement.

DATED: January 13, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

DAVID L. ANDERSON

United States Attorney s/ Elizabeth D. Kurlan

ELIZABETH D. KURLAN

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: January 13, 2021 s/ Matt Adams

MATT ADAMS

Attorney

Northwest Immigrant Rights Project

Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ordered that the proceedings in this case is stayed until February 15, 2021. The parties shall provide a joint status report by February 15, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 1/14/2021 g Aapurd §, Ml}

HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR: United States District Judge

STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.