State of California v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Trial Court Opinion
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Case No. 18-cv-03237-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 145 10 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Defendants.
13 The Court fully incorporates the factual background from its prior order denying EPA’s Rule 60(b) motion. See California v. United States EPA, No. 18-cv-03237-HSG, 2019 U.S. Dist. 15 LEXIS 192206, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2019).
16 On October 22, 2020, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Court’s order denying EPA’s Rule 60(b) motion to modify an injunction which required EPA to promulgate its federal landfill emissions plan by November 6, 2019. California v. United States EPA, 978 F.3d 708, 719 (9th Cir. 2020). EPA had promulgated new regulations changing the regulatory deadline underpinning the injunction. Id. at 711. The Ninth Circuit held that “EPA’s new regulations ha[d] removed the legal basis for the court’s deadline” and that the Court had “refuse[d] to modify an injunction based on superseded law.” Id. at 717, 719. The Ninth Circuit remanded “with instructions for the district court to modify the injunction consistent with this opinion.” Id. at 719.
24 As directed by the Ninth Circuit, the Court modifies the injunction to eliminate the obligation “to promulgate regulations setting forth a federal plan, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 26 60.27(d), no later than November 6, 2019.” See California v. United States EPA, 385 F. Supp. 3d 27 903, 916 (N.D. Cal. 2019).
1 review of EPA’s new regulation in the U.S. Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit.
2 See Dkt. No. 145 at 2. On December 14, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a motion to stay in this case, asking the Court to stay the injunction pending resolution of the petition in the D.C. Circuit. /d. But now that the Court has made the modification mandated by the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, there is nothing to stay, because EPA has already complied with the remainder of the injunction. Accordingly, the Motion to Stay is DENIED.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 Dated: 1/19/2021 11 7 Haspurtrd Lh, HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 12 United States District Judge ©
Z 18
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.