Hufnus v. DoNotPay, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MATHEW HUFNUS, individually and on behalf ) CASE NO.: 3:20-cv-08701-VC of all others similarly situated, ) 12 ) [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, ) GRANTING DEFENDANT 13 ) DONOTPAY, INC.’S MOTION 14 v. ) TO STAY ) DONOTPAY, INC., a Delaware Corporation ) Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria ) 16 Defendant. ) Complaint Filed: December 9, 2020 ) 17 ) 1 Defendant DONOTPAY, INC.’s Motion to Stay came on for hearing on February 25, || 2021. Having considered the papers filed in support of and opposition to said Motion, the || argument of counsel, and all other pleadings and papers on file herein, and for good cause shown, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The case is stayed pending a || decision from the Supreme Court in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S.Ct. 193, 207 L. Ed. 2d 1118 || (2020). The parties shall promptly advise the Court by letter when the Supreme Court has issued || 1ts decision. <SDISTRI SS Ky oO VED Dated: January 26 2021 APPRO 10 MLE \ < 1 Z. ia j= Oo dge Vince AL: fe 12 cn <A LY) 13 DIstRica
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.