Frelimo v. BHP Members

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Frelimo v. BHP Members

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OBA LEE FRELIMO, Case No. 21-cv-00282-YGR (PR)

8 Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER

v. 9

10 JEFF LYNCH, Acting Warden,1 Respondent. 11

12 Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus 13 challenging the most recent decision at his Board of Parole Hearing “Youth Offender hearing on 14 Dec. 15, 2020” where he was “illegally denied release from prison.” Dkt. 1 at 5-6. He has not 15 filed an in forma pauperis application. 16 A petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a state prisoner in a State that contains two 17 or more federal judicial districts may be filed in either the district of confinement or the district of 18 conviction. See

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(d). The district court where the petition is filed, however, may 19 transfer the petition to the other district in the furtherance of justice. See

id.

Federal courts in 20 California traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the 21 district of conviction. See Dannenberg v. Ingle,

831 F. Supp. 767, 767

(N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. 22 Nelson,

279 F. Supp. 265, 266

(N.D. Cal. 1968). But if a habeas petition is directed to the manner 23 in which a sentence is being executed, e.g., if it involves parole or time credit claims, the district 24 of confinement is the preferable forum. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman,

875 F.2d 25

244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). 26 Petitioner is incarcerated at California State Prison - Sacramento in Represa, California, 27 1 which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See

28 U.S.C. § 84

. Because 2 || Petitioner challenges the execution of his sentence, the Court hereby ORDERS that pursuant to 28

3 U.S.C. § 1404

(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and in the interests of justice, this petition be 4 TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 5 If Petitioner wishes to further pursue this action, he must complete the in forma pauperis 6 application required by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California and 7 mail it to that district. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: January 29, 2021 10 11 GE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 12 United States District Judge

© 15 16 & = 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown