United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2021

V.G.M. v. City of Salinas

V.G.M. v. City of Salinas
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided February 16, 2021
V.G.M. v. City of Salinas

Trial Court Opinion

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq.

State Bar #69888 2 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 3 Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 4 Oakland, California 94621 5 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 6 Email: [email protected]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 V.G.M., et al., Case No. 19-cv-08007-BLF 14 Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 15 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 16 CITY OF SALINAS, et al., REGARDING RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants.

As set forth in Respondent’s Motion to File Under Seal, Respondent lodged with the Court the following documents containing information designated "Confidential”: Exhibit A: A copy of the Retainer Agreement, pertaining to the instant matter; Exhibit B: Copies of the Retainer Agreements, pertaining to the instant matter; Exhibit C: Email from Melissa Nold dated August 3, 2020, pertaining to the instant matter.

Having considered Respondent’s Administrative Motion, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) in support of sealing, the Court finds that the good cause standard of Rule 26(c) applies since the records are not related to the merits of the case. Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above referenced documents be filed under seal.

2 || Dated: February 16, 2021 kom Lh ham én) BETH LABSON FREEMAN 4 United States District Judge a 12

©

Z 18

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.