United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2021

Nguyen v. Pelosi

Nguyen v. Pelosi
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided March 4, 2021
Nguyen v. Pelosi

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN, Case No. 20-CV-08755-LHK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

RECONSIDER APPLICATION TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

NANCY PELOSI, Speaker of the United Re: Dkt. No. 7

States House of Representatives, and

MITCH MCCONNELL, Minority Leader of the United States Senate,

Defendants.

On January 11, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis.

ECF No. 5. The Court held both that Plaintiff had failed to show poverty and that “Plaintiff’s inscrutable pro se complaint against Speaker Pelosi and Senator McConnell is frivolous.” Id. at 2.

On January 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to reconsider her application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff then filed an amended complaint on January 19, 2021. ECF No. 6.

The amended complaint is still frivolous. It makes essentially only two changes to the original complaint. First, the amended complaint states that “mental illness expense [sic] is very expensive (willing to drop lawsuit).” Jd. at 4. Second, the amended complaint states that “[Plaintiff] will drop the lawsuit if Pelosi & McConnell remove the 2nd impeachment [sic] of President Trump.” /d. Because the amended complaint is frivolous, the Court DENIES □□□□□□□□□□□ instant motion to reconsider her application to proceed in forma pauperis. Moreover, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint and amended complaint, ECF Nos. 1 & 6.

6 Should Plaintiff elect to file a non-frivolous second amended complaint, Plaintiff must do so within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to file a non-frivolous second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order will result in dismissal of this case with prejudice. A third frivolous complaint would confirm that further amendment would be legally futile. See Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music Publ’g, 512 F.3d 522, 532 (9th Cir. 2008) (explaining when denying leave to amend is warranted).

12 Also, within 30 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either file a new motion to || proceed in forma pauperis, including a new financial affidavit, or pay any outstanding fees, costs, S 14 || or security. See Civil L-R. 3-10 (governing motions to proceed in forma pauperis). 15 Lastly, the Court continues the March 10, 2021 case management conference to April 21, A 16 || 2021. If this case has not been dismissed, Plaintiff shall file a case management statement by April 47 14,2021.

Z 18 || ITISSO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2021 fucy i Cot \

LUCY @ KOH

United States District Judge

Case No. 20-CV-O8755-LHK eee

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.