Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired v. Nova Casualty Company

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired v. Nova Casualty Company

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND CASE No. 20-cv-09445-YGR VISUALLY IMPAIRED D/B/A HANOVER 7 INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND 8 Plaintiff, AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 9 VS. Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 11 10 Nova CASUALTY CO., ET AL., 11 Defendants. gq On November 4, 2020, plaintiff filed this action in Napa County Superior Court.

13 || Defendant Nova Casualty Company d/b/a Hanover Insurance Group (“Nova”) removed the case to

14 federal court on December 30, 2020. (Dkt. No. 1.) On January 6, 2021, defendants Nova,

8 15 || Anthony DeCesare, and Steven Koski filed a motion to dismiss DeCesare and Koski from this © 16 || action under Federal Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 9.) On January 20, 2021, plaintiff filed a Motion to

17 || Remand based on the lack of complete diversity. (Dkt. No. 11.) Having carefully considered the

18 || briefing and arguments submitted on the motion, and for the reasons stated on the record at the 19 || March 2, 2021 hearing, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs Motion to Remand and DENIES AS MOOT 20 || defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Defendants “ha[ve] not demonstrated that there is no possibility 21 that [plaintiff] ] could [state a negligent misrepresentation claim] against [Koski].” See 22 || GranCare, LLC v. Thrower,

889 F.3d 543, 551

(9th Cir. 2018). 23 The Clerk of the Court is directed to REMAND the case to the Napa County Superior Court 24 || and close the file. 25 IT Is SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: March 9, 2021 28 YVONNE GONZATEZ ROGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown