Wilson v. Skywest Airlines, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 |} Amanda C. Sommerfeld (State Bar No. 185052) [email protected] || JONES DAY South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor || Los Angeles, CA 90071.2300 Telephone: +1.213.489.3939 || Facsimile: = +1.213.243.2539 || Anthony J. Dick (admitted pro hac vice) [email protected] || JONES DAY Louisiana Avenue, N.W. || Washington, D.C. 20001-2113 Telephone: +1.202.879.3939 || Facsimile: +1.202.626.1700 || Scott Morrison (SBN 320167) [email protected] || JONES DAY 4655 Executive Drive, Suite 1500 || San Diego, CA 92121 Telephone: +1.858.314.1189 || Facsimile: +1.844.345.3178 || Attorneys for Defendant SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiffs’ counsel listed on next page 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION || TREMAINE WILSON, et al., Case No. 3:19-CV-01491-VC 21 Plaintiffs, JOINT STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CROSS- 22 Vv. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND [PROPOSED] || SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC., ORDER AS MODIFIED 24 Defendant. Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED-ORDER CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC || Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. (SBN 220972) THE BAINER LAW FIRM || 1901 Harrison St., Suite 1100 Oakland, California 94612 || Telephone: (510) 922-1802 Facsimile: (510) 844-7701 || [email protected] || Attorneys for Plaintiffs ‘ Tremaine Wilson and Lauren Becker 1] JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER ry CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC 1 On March 17, 2021, the Court held a Case Management Conference to discuss the parties’ || cross motions for summary judgment in light of the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling in Bernstein v. || Virgin America, Inc., --- F.3d ---, 2021 WL 867583 (9th Cir. Feb. 23, 2021) (publication || pending). Ultimately, the Court ordered the parties to file new cross motions for summary || judgment. The Court set a hearing date on those cross motions for May 27, 2021, and ordered the || parties to stipulate to a briefing schedule consistent with the Court’s Standing Order.
7 On March 19, 2021, one of SkyWest’s lawyers had an unexpected death in the immediate || family and will be out of the office and traveling in order to get affairs in order. The Parties have || conferred over a schedule that takes this into consideration and also affords them the time each || believes is appropriate. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request a brief continuance of the hearing || on their cross-motions for summary judgment to June 17, 2021. The Parties stipulate to the || following briefing schedule in light of that continuance, which respects the Court’s Standing || Order by allowing two weeks between the fourth brief and the hearing date and more than seven || weeks between the first brief and the hearing date.
I || | opposition || IT IS SO STIPULATED. /// /// /// JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC | DATED: March 24, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 3 By: s/ Amanda Sommerfeld Amanda C. Sommerfeld 4 Scott Morrison Anthony Dick 5 JONES DAY 6 Attorneys for Defendants SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. g DATED: March 24, 2021 By: Matthew Bainer Matthew R. Bainer 9 THE BAINER LAW FIRM 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TREMAINE WILSON and LAUREN BECKER and the Class JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER ry CASE NO. 3:19-CV-0149]1-VC 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) 2 I, Amanda C. Sommerfeld, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been || obtained from the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the || United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
5 Executed this 24th day of March, 2021, at Los Angeles, California. s/_ Amanda Sommerfeld 7 AMANDA C. SOMMERFELD 1] JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED ORDER 7 CASE NO. 3:19-CV-0149]1-VC l [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED |) PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3 | DATED- March 29. 2021 LEE [RS SS | yr 1s SO oR 6 ~ woe □ bri2 . \\ Lo A SS 10 DISTRICS JOINT STIPULATION; PROPOSED-ORDER CASE NO. 3:19-CV-01491-VC
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.