United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2021

Bledsoe v. Granberry

Bledsoe v. Granberry
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided April 9, 2021
Bledsoe v. Granberry

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 2:19-cv-1648 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER SHAWN GRANBERRY, et al., 15 Defendants, 17 Plaintiff Donnell Bledsoe is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s second amended complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 13.) Therein, plaintiff complains about alleged copyright infringement.

22 On October 19, 2020, the undersigned issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) That order raised the issue of whether the Eastern District was the proper venue for this action. (Id. at 4.) On March 26, 2021, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) According to the second amended complaint the defendants in this action reside in Oakland, CA. (Am. Compl. (ECF No. 13) at 1.) And the alleged copyright infringement “took place” in Oakland, CA, and Emeryville, CA. (Id. at 4.)

28 //// 1 The court may “raise the issue of defective venue on its own motion.” Costlow v. Weeks, | 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986) (affirming sua sponte dismissal for improper venue).

3 | Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b): 4 A civil action may be brought in— 5 (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants 6 are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or 7 omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of 3 property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought 9 as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect 10 to such action.

11 Here, second amended complaint alleges that the defendants reside—and the events | giving rise to the claim at issue took place—in the judicial district for the United States District | Court for the Northern District of California. “The district court of a district in which is filed a | case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of | justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 | U.S.C. § 1406.

17 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United | States District Court for the Northern District of California.

19 | Dated: April 8, 2021 22 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 07 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.pro se\bledsoe1648.transfer.ord

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.