Ocegueda v. Zuckerberg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

San Francisco Division

1] NATALIE OCEGUEDA, derivatively on Case No. 20-cv-04444-LB behalf of Facebook, . .

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO □ ENLARGE TIME .

Re: ECF No. 66

MARK ZUCKERBERG, et al.,

Oo

Defendants.

For the reasons stated in In re Facebook, the court denies the motion because the plaintiff has n established that the court should lift the PSLRA stay. Jn re Facebook, Inc. S’holder Derivative Liti; 411 F. Supp. 3d 649, 652-54 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019). The plaintiff’s cases are distinguishable. / at 655-56 (distinguishing King v. Verifone Holdings, Inc., 12 A.3d 1140 (Del. 2011) and Oswald v. Humphreys, No. C 16-00241 CRB, 2016 WL 6582025 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2016)). The case from th Central District did not address the Facebook decision and has a distinguishable context. This disposes of ECF No. 66.

IT IS SO ORDERED. LAE

Dated: April 16, 2021

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge