Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
San Francisco Division
STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG (LB) Plaintifts, Re: ECF No. 233
13 V. © 14 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et
15 te
Defendants. a 16 = 17 The parties dispute the scope of the plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) depositions that they scheduled for this month in anticipation of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Letter Brief — ECF No. 233.) The court held a hearing on April 22, 2021. The court allows five days of depositions on the topics designated by the plaintiffs in the letter brief. at 3.) The case is complex and sprawling. Courts allow more extensive Rule 30(b) depositions on complex cases akin to this one. See, e.g., Lopez v. S.F. Unified Sch. Dist., No. C 99-00230 SI, 2004 WL 6065998, at *3—4 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2004).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 22, 2021 Lit EC
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.