1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALEXIS PAZ-VILLAGOMEZ, Case No. 20-cv-00606-SI

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 v. DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR MOTION TO 10 THE STEP2 COMPANY, LLC, COMPEL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF CHRISTINA LANSDOWN, LMFT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 70 12 13 On April 14, 2021, defendant The Two Step Company, LLC filed an ex parte application for 14 motion to compel deposition testimony of Christina Lansdown, LMFT. Dkt. No. 70. On April 16, 15 2021, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendant’s ex parte application and defendant filed a reply. 16 Dkt. Nos. 71; 72. 17 Defendant’s ex parte application concerns deposition testimony of Christina Lansdown, a 18 therapist who provided plaintiff and plaintiff’s family with family counseling. Dkt. No. 71 at 1. 19 During Ms. Lansdown’s deposition, Ms. Lansdown declined to answer questions regarding her 20 communications with plaintiff and plaintiff’s family and asserted the psychotherapist-client 21 privilege. Dkt. No. 70-2 at 6-22 (Lansdown Depo.). 22 Defendant argues the patient-litigant exception to the psychotherapist-client privilege 23 compels Ms. Lansdown to disclose her communications with plaintiff and plaintiff’s family. Dkt. 24 No. 70 at 10. Defendant argues the patient-litigant exception applies because plaintiff has put his 25 mental state and emotional condition at issue in the present litigation. Id. Plaintiff agrees that 26 plaintiff “tendered [his] mental condition in this case,” but argues Ms. Lansdown’s communications 27 with plaintiff’s family are not at issue and may not be disclosed. Dkt. No. 71 at 3, 5-6. 1 PART defendant’s ex parte application to compel deposition testimony of Christina Lansdown. The 2 || parties agree that plaintiff has placed his mental condition at issue in this case. Accordingly, 3 || Christina Lansdown is ORDERED to provide deposition testimony regarding her communications 4 || and diagnoses of plaintiff, Alexis Paz-Villagomez. See In re Lifschutz,

(Cal. 5 1970) (“[P]atient-litigant exception allows only a limited inquiry into the confidences of the 6 || psychotherapist-patient relationship, compelling disclosure of only those matters directly relevant 7 || to the nature of the specific ‘emotional or mental’ condition which the patient has voluntarily 8 || disclosed and tendered in his pleadings or in answer to discovery inquiries.”). Christina Lansdown 9 || is ORDERED to provide testimony involving what she learned from plaintiff, including what 10 || plaintiff said, but is not required to disclose communications from plaintiff's family members. If 11 needed, the Court will accommodate additional time for fact discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 |] Dated: April 23, 2021 Site WU tee 15 SUSAN ILLSTON = 16 United States District Judge

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28