1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY G. TERRY, 11 Case No. 20-07859 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED v. 13 COMPLAINT

14 DARYL L. DORSEY, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 18 Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42

against prison staff at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”).1 On March 19, 20 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend within twenty-eight days of 21 the order. Dkt. No. 9. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an amended 22 complaint. However, the Court notes that on March 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice of 23 change of address and another on April 7, 2021, indicating that he has been moved to 24 Chino State Prison. Dkt. Nos. 7, 10. It is unclear from the docket whether the Order of 25 Dismissal with Leave to Amend was sent to Plaintiff’s former address or to his current 26 address at CSP. Dkt. Nos. 8, 9. In an abundance of caution, the Court will order another 27 1 copy of the last court order be sent to Plaintiff at CSP. Plaintiff shall be granted an 2 || extension of time to file an amended complaint that complies with the court order. 3 4 CONCLUSION 5 Based on the foregoing, the Court orders as follows: 6 1. The Court sua sponte grants Plaintiff an extension of time to file an amended 7 || complaint. Within twenty-eight (28) days of the date this order is filed, Plaintiff shall file 8 || an amended complaint to correct the deficiencies described in the Court’s “Order of g || Dismissal with Leave to Amend.” Dkt. No. 9. The amended complaint must include the 10 || caption and civil case number used in this order, Case No. C 20-07859 BLF (PR), and the 11 || words “AMENDED COMPLAINT” on the first page. If using the court form complaint, 2 Plaintiff must answer all the questions on the form in order for the action to proceed. The E 13 || amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non- S 14 || existent. Ramirez v. Cty. Of San Bernardino,

(9th Cir. 2015). 3 15 || Consequently, claims not included in an amended complaint are no longer claims and 16 || defendants not named in an amended complaint are no longer defendants. See Ferdik v. 5 17 || Bonzelet,

(9th Cir. 1992). 5 18 2. Failure to respond in accordance with this order in the time provided will 19 || result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to 20 || Plaintiff. 21 3. The Clerk shall include a copy of the Court’s last order filed under Docket 22 || No. 9, along with two copies of the court’s complaint and a copy of the court’s form 23 || petition with a copy of this order to Plaintiff. 24 IT ISSO ORDERED. 25 || Dated: May 4, 2021 heh hw homens BETH LABSON F REEMAN United States District Judge 27 |) RSStrr cota