Delmonico v. Bonta
Trial Court Opinion
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MICHAEL JOHN DELMONICO, Case No. 21-cv-02009-HSG 8 Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 Vv.
10 ROB BONTA, 11 Respondent.
13 Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 || challenging a 2018 misdemeanor conviction from Palo Alto Superior Court.’ On March 31, 2021, the 15 || Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend because the ineffective assistance of counsel a 16 || claim was insufficiently pled. ECF No. 3. The Court informed Petitioner that the failure to timely 17 || file an amended petition would result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute under 18 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Id. The deadline to file an amended petition has passed, and Plaintiff has || not filed an amended petition or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this || petition is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute || and for failure to comply with the Court’s March 31, 2021 order. The Clerk shall close the file.
22 IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 || Dated: 5/19/2021 24 Alayredd 5 Sb □□□ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 25 United States District Judge 27 ' The Clerk of the Court is directed to substitute Rob Bonta, the California Attorney General, in 2g || place of the previously named respondent because Attorney General Bonta is Petitioner’s current custodian. See Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir.), as amended (May 8, 1996).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.