James Meyers v. Facebook, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

James Meyers v. Facebook, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 LEAlTizHabAeMth L&. WDeAelTeKy I(NBSar L NLoP. 230798) 2 [email protected] Melanie M. Blunschi (Bar No. 234264) 3 [email protected] 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 4 San Francisco, CA 94111 415.391.0600 / 415.395.8095 (Fax) 5 Andrew B. Clubok (pro hac vice) 6 [email protected] Susan E. Engel (pro hac vice) 7 [email protected] 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000 8 Washington, D.C. 20004 202.637.2200 / 202.637.2201 (Fax) 9 Counsel for Defendant Facebook, Inc. 10 Additional Counsel on Signature Page 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 JAMES MEYERS, on behalf of himself and Case No. 3:18-cv-00062-WHO 15 all others similarly situated, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 Plaintiff, EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 17 v. FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

18 FACEBOOK, INC.,

19 Defendant. Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendant Facebook, Inc., and Plaintiff James Meyers 2 stipulate as follows:

3 1. On May 19, 2021, Meyers moved for leave to file a third amended complaint. See

4 ECF No. 60.

5 2. Facebook’s opposition is due June 2, 2021, and Meyers’s reply is due June 9, 2021.

6 See ECF No. 61.

7 3. In light of the Memorial Day holiday period and to provide the parties with

8 adequate time to brief the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v.

9 Duguid,

141 S. Ct. 1163

(2021), the parties agree that is appropriate to extend the briefing schedule

10 on Meyers’s motion as follows:

11 • Facebook’s opposition will be due June 18, 2021.

12 • Meyers’s reply will be due July 2, 2021.

13 4. This extension will not affect the hearing date on Meyer’s motion, which is July

14 21, 2021.

15 IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16 Dated: May 20, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

17 /s/ Melanie M. Blunschi Melanie M. Blunschi (Bar No. 234264) 18 Elizabeth L. Deeley (Bar No. 230798) LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 19 505 Montgomery Street Suite 2000 20 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 395-8233 21 Fax: (415) 395-8095 Email: [email protected] 22 [email protected]

23 Andrew B. Clubok (pro hac vice) Susan E. Engel (pro hac vice) 24 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000 25 Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 Telephone: (202) 637-2200 26 Fax: (202) 637-2201 Email: [email protected] 27 [email protected]

28 Counsel for Defendant Facebook, Inc. 1 2 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

3 /s/ L. Timothy Fisher L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) 4 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 5 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 6 E-Mail: [email protected]

7 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006) 8 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1420 Miami, FL 33131 9 Telephone: 305-330-5512 E-Mail: [email protected] 10 NATHAN & ASSOCIATES, APC 11 Reuben D. Nathan (State Bar No. 208436) 600 W. Broadway, Suite 700 12 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: (619) 272-7014 13 Fax:(619) 330-1819 E-Mail: [email protected] 14

15 Counsel for Plaintiff James Meyers

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)(3) 2 I attest that I am the ECF user whose identification and password is being used to file this

3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to

4 File Third Amended Complaint and that all signatories on whose behalf this filing is submitted

5 concur in its content and have authorized its filing.

6 Dated: May 20, 2021 /s/ Melanie M. Blunschi Melanie M. Blunschi 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule on □□□□□□□□□□□ 3 | Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, the Court hereby GRANTS the stipulated 4 || request and modifies the schedule as follows: 5 e Facebook’s opposition is now due June 18, 2021. 6 e Brickman’s reply is now due July 2, 2021. 7 | PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. : \f 9 || Dated: May 20, 2021 ® n. William H. Orrick 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

K IN Sur [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIP. ON PL. ’s M

Reference

Status
Unknown