Hazari v. County of Santa Clara
Trial Court Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CYRUS HAZARI, Case No. 19-cv-04392-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 Vv. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILING 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 11 Defendants.
13 On June 28, 2021, Plaintiff Cyrus Hazari filed a motion for a temporary restraining order v 14 || based on a tax delinquency sale notice sent by Defendant County of Santa Clara. ECF 38. However, O || it is not clear to the Court that the complaint alleges any facts related to Plaintiff's tax deficiency.
Q 16 || See generally Compl., ECF 1. And Plaintiff does not make a showing as to any of the factors outlined 17 in Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). In particular, the Court finds that || Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his claims. See id. || Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order WITHOUT || PREJUDICE to Plaintiff moving for a preliminary injunction.
21 The Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s concurrently filed motion for disability || accommodation. See ECF 37, Hazari Declaration at 2 (requesting that TRO be heard without 23 appearance).
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 || Dated: June 28, 2021 han an 21 Kom Lr M BETH LABSON FREEMAN 28 United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.