Love v. Hassan
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 19-cv-01871-JD Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE MOGEEB M. HASSAN,
Re: Dkt. No. 62
Defendant. qg 12
Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim filed a report recommending dismissal of this case for v 14 || plaintiffs failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 162. No objections have been filed in response to the report, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
16 As the report demonstrates, plaintiff did not move his case forward despite multiple = 17 || admonishments, orders to show cause, and monetary sanctions issued by the magistrate judge.
18 || Defendant has not made an appearance in this action. Consequently, the Court adopts the report and recommendation in full, and exercises its “inherent power” to dismiss the case with prejudice for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1996).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 27, 2021
JAMES/PONATO
United Ptates District Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.