United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2021

Alaimo v. Miller

Alaimo v. Miller
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided August 24, 2021
Alaimo v. Miller

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY MARCUS ALAIMO, Case No. 21-cv-06329-NC Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. REMANDED

STEVEN M. MILLER, Re: ECF 1

Defendant.

Plaintiff Anthony Marcus Alaimo removed this case from Santa Clara County Superior Court on August 17, 2021. ECF 1. In his removal notice, Alaimo alleges that removal is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). See id. at 3. Section 1446(a) does govern removal of civil actions, however, it only allows “a defendant or defendants” the ability to remove a case from state to federal court. As the party who chose the original forum, a plaintiff does not get to change their mind and remove a case to federal court later. See Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, 139 S. Ct. 1743, 1761 (2019). Alaimo does title himself as “Defendant” in his introduction, but everywhere else in the complaint, he refers to himself as “Plaintiff.” ECF 1 at 1, 3; ECF 1-1 at 1. As the person who filed the original complaint, and who chose the original forum, Alaimo does not have the authority to remove this case to federal court. See Home Depot 139 S. Ct. at 1761.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Alaimo to show cause in writing why this case should not be remanded by September 23, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2021 —<———~_ _ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge o 17

1g

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.