Green v. City of San Pablo
Green v. City of San Pablo
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 || WALTER GREEN AND L.B., A MINOR, BY AND Case No. 4:20-CV-6715-YGR THROUGH HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, 6 || VANETRA GREEN, ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR’S COMPROMISE AND 7 Plaintiffs, CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE UPON SETTLEMENT 8 vs. Re: Dkt. No. 33 9 || CITY OF SAN PABLO, ET AL., 10 Defendant. 11 Petitioner Vanetra Green, guardian ad litem for minor plaintiff 1.B., has filed a petition for a1 12 || order approving the compromise of minor I.B.’s claim. (Dkt. No. 33.)! Defendants have filed a 5 13 ||notice of non-opposition to the petition. (Dkt. No. 35.) Having carefully reviewed the papers filed 1 14 ||support of the petition, including the declarations of plaintiffs’ counsel, the Court finds that the term 15 of the settlement to be reasonable and in the best interest of the minor. Accordingly, the petition for Z 16 || approval of the minor’s compromise is GRANTED.
5 17 In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED and any remaining dates 18 or deadlines set in this matter are VACATED. It is further ORDERED that if any party certifies to this 19 Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that this 20 case should be reopened, this order shall be vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar fo 21 || further proceedings. 22 This Order terminates Docket Numbers 33. 23 IT Is SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2021 25 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 97 ' The Court has determined that the petition is appropriate for decision without oral argumen as permitted by Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. See also Lake at Li 28 || Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Dev. Corp.,
933 F.2d 724, 728-29 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing set for November 9, 2021.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown