United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2021

Green v. City of San Pablo

Green v. City of San Pablo
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided November 2, 2021
Green v. City of San Pablo

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER GREEN AND L.B., A MINOR, BY AND Case No. 4:20-CV-6715-YGR THROUGH HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND,

VANETRA GREEN, ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR’S COMPROMISE AND

Plaintiffs, CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE UPON SETTLEMENT vs.

Re: Dkt. No. 33

CITY OF SAN PABLO, ET AL.,

Defendant.

Petitioner Vanetra Green, guardian ad litem for minor plaintiff 1.B., has filed a petition for a1 order approving the compromise of minor I.B.’s claim. (Dkt. No. 33.)! Defendants have filed a ||notice of non-opposition to the petition. (Dkt. No. 35.) Having carefully reviewed the papers filed 1 support of the petition, including the declarations of plaintiffs’ counsel, the Court finds that the term of the settlement to be reasonable and in the best interest of the minor. Accordingly, the petition for Z approval of the minor’s compromise is GRANTED.

17 In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED and any remaining dates or deadlines set in this matter are VACATED. It is further ORDERED that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that this case should be reopened, this order shall be vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar fo further proceedings.

This Order terminates Docket Numbers 33.

IT Is SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2021

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 97 ' The Court has determined that the petition is appropriate for decision without oral argumen as permitted by Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. See also Lake at Li Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Dev. Corp., 933 F.2d 724, 728-29 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing set for November 9, 2021.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.