King v. United States Penitentiary
King v. United States Penitentiary
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARREL KING, Case No. 21-cv-08310-RMI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 v. 10 UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY, ll Defendant. 12
Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, filed a pro se habeas petition, but after reviewing the filing it is 14 || clear that Plaintiff seeks relief regarding the conditions of his confinement pursuant to Bivens v. 3 15 Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents,
403 U.S. 388, 392-97(1971). Plaintiff presents 16 || allegations pertaining to events that occurred at the United States Penitentiary Victorville where he 5 17 || is incarcerated. That prison is located in the Central District of California. The acts underlying this 18 complaint occurred in the Central District, where and Plaintiff and Defendants reside. Venue, 19 || therefore, properly lies in that district and not in this one. See
28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Accordingly, 20 || this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of 21 || California. See
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: November 2, 2021 24 Mt Z □ 25 26 RQBERT M. ILLMAN United States Magistrate Judge 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown