1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ZACHARY THAYER, Case No. 4:21-cv-03936-YGR 6 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE To FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 7 v. g UBER, INC. — UBER EAT’S, ET AL., 9 Defendants. 10 || To Plaintiff Zachary Thayer: 11 On September 15, 2021, the Court entered an Order dismissing plaintiff's first amended 12 || complaint with leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 9.) Plaintiff's amended complaint was due by October 5 13 15, 2021. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Thus, the order of dismissal 14 stands and the case is dismissed. Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier,

, 989 (9th Cir. 1999) 3 15 || (affirming dismissal of action following plaintiff's failure to amend complaint after receiving a 16 || leave to do so, where the interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, the court’s management of 3 17 || its docket, and avoiding prejudice to defendants favored dismissal). 18 The Clerk of the Court shall close the file and not accept any further filings in this docket 19 |} number. This Order terminates the case. 20 IT Is SO ORDERED. 2] Dated: November 5, 2021 22 Laces tgeteilee 73 VONNE GONZA¥EZ □□□□□□ □□ NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28