1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE KOENIG, Case No. 21-cv-08522-PJH Plaintiff, 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 Re: Dkt. No. 1 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, a Missouri state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil action. Plaintiff 14 has now filed a notice stating that he did not seek to open a new case and seeks to 15 voluntarily dismiss this action. Docket No. 5. Plaintiff’s motion (Docket No. 1) is DENIED 16 and this case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 41(a). No fee is due. To the extent plaintiff seeks to file a motion in Scholl v. Mnuchin, 18

(N.D. Cal. 2020), any such request is denied. That case is closed. 19 If plaintiff seeks relief regarding his economic impact payment, he must file a case in the 20 appropriate district in Missouri. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: December 8, 2021 23 24 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 25 United States District Judge 26 27