Duhamel v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Leon Duhamel, Jr., Case No.: 18-cv-02624-LAB-JLB Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION, DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

Nancy A. Berryhill,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

Defendant. AFFIRMING THE

COMMISSIONER’S DECISION

Plaintiff Leon Duhamel, Jr. filed his complaint, seeking relief from denial of Social Security disability benefits. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Jill Burkhardt for report and recommendation. After Defendant’s counsel filed the administrative record, Plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Judge Burkhardt issued her report and recommendation (the “R&R”) on November 12, 2020, recommending that his motion for summary judgment be denied, and that the Commissioner’s decision denying relief should be affirmed. Objections to the R&R were due November 30, 2020, but none have been filed.

A district court has jurisdiction to review a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation on dispositive matters. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). “The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to.” Id. Section 636(b)(1) similarly requires that a district judge “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” “A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” Id.

This section does not require some lesser review by the district court when no objections are filed. Thomas vy. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985). The “statute makes it \|clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original).

Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds it to be correct, and ADOPTS it. /Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED, nd _ the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2021

Hon. Larry Alan Burns United States District Judge