Charman v. Selectquote Insurance Services
Charman v. Selectquote Insurance Services
Trial Court Opinion
ay | JAN 0 § 202 | soute Slee □□ 4 gee
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 □ 10 || THANE CHARMAN, individually and on| Case No.: 3:20-cv-0710-BEN-BLM 1 behalf of others similarly situated, . . □□□ ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiff, 12 MOTION TO DISMISS V. 13 || SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE [ECE No. 29] SERVICES, □ Is Defendant. 16 . 7 On January 5, 2021, Plaintiff Thane Charman and Defendant SelectQuote 1g || !nsurance Services filed a Joint Motion for Dismissal. ECF No. 29. The Parties seek 19 dismissal of Plaintiff's claims with prejudice, and dismissal of the putative class’s claims || without prejudice. Jd. at 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the 91 Court grants the Joint Motion. The Court has also considered the factors set forth in Diaz v. Trust Territory of Pac. Islands,
876 F.2d 1401, 1408-11 (9th Cir. 1986), and 3 concludes additional class notice is not required in this case. Plaintiff’s claims are a4 || dismissed with prejudice, and any claims of putative class members are dismissed 95 || without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and fees, 26 ITISSOORDERED. ||Date: January fg, 2021 WM UL _¢ HOM. ROGER T.BENKIEZ 28 United States District Fudge” 3:20-cv-0710-BEN-BLM
Reference
- Status
- Unknown